Skip to main content

What about God’s existence?

What about asking whether God exists without reducing God to an object to be proven—how does Scripture invite knowing God as presence before proposition?

"Does God exist?" The question seems straightforward enough—a yes-or-no proposition requiring evidence, argumentation, and logical demonstration. But what if the very framing of the question misses something essential about the nature of God and how Scripture presents Him? What if God is not primarily an object to be proven, but a presence to be encountered? What if knowing God is less like solving a theorem and more like knowing a person—or better yet, being known by one?

The Problem with "Proving" God

Modern Western thought has conditioned us to approach existence questions through the lens of scientific verification or logical proof. We ask: Can we demonstrate empirically that X exists? Can we argue syllogistically to X's existence? This works reasonably well for objects within the created order—planets, molecules, historical events. But when applied to God, this methodology reveals its limits.

God is not an object among objects. He is not a being among beings, something "out there" whose existence can be established by neutral observation. As the Creator of all that exists, God stands in a fundamentally different category than His creation. He is the ground of being itself, not one more entity whose being requires grounding.

Scripture never treats God's existence as a hypothesis requiring proof. The Bible doesn't begin with arguments for God—it begins with God acting: "In the beginning, God created..." (Genesis 1:1). The biblical authors assume God's reality as the most fundamental fact of existence, the self-evident truth from which all other truths flow.

The biblical worldview assumes encounter, not inference. When the psalmist declares, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'" (Psalm 14:1), the problem isn't intellectual doubt—it's moral and relational rebellion. The fool doesn't lack evidence; he suppresses the truth. Paul echoes this in Romans 1:19-20: "What can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them... So they are without excuse." Knowledge of God, in the biblical view, is not achieved through argument but received through revelation—and the primary human problem is not ignorance but resistance.

Presence Before Proposition

Scripture consistently presents God as presence before proposition. God is not first a concept to be grasped intellectually, but a reality to be encountered relationally.

The biblical pattern: God reveals Himself through presence

  • To Adam and Eve: God walks in the garden "in the cool of the day" (Genesis 3:8). He is not a distant abstraction but an immediate presence with whom they have face-to-face relationship.

  • To Abraham: God appears—sometimes as a voice, sometimes in visions, sometimes through divine messengers. Abraham "believed the LORD" (Genesis 15:6), not because he constructed a philosophical argument, but because God spoke to him personally.

  • To Moses: God reveals Himself in the burning bush (Exodus 3), not with a syllogism but with fire and voice and personal address: "I AM WHO I AM." Moses knows God exists not by proving it, but by being confronted by the living God who calls him by name.

  • To Israel: At Sinai, God descends in fire, smoke, and trumpet blast. The mountain trembles. The people encounter God's overwhelming presence—not an argument for God's existence, but an experience of it so intense they plead for Moses to mediate (Exodus 20:18-19).

  • To Elijah: God reveals Himself not in the wind, earthquake, or fire, but in "the sound of a low whisper" (1 Kings 19:12). Even when subtle, God's self-disclosure is personal, immediate, and unmistakable to the one addressed.

  • In Jesus Christ: "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory" (John 1:14). God's ultimate self-revelation is not a proposition but a person. To encounter Jesus is to encounter God. Philip asks, "Show us the Father," and Jesus replies, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father" (John 14:8-9).

In each case, the question is not whether God exists but how one responds to the God who is already present and making Himself known.

Sacred Space: The Context of Encounter

Scripture's presentation of God's existence is inseparable from the theme of sacred space—places and moments where heaven and earth overlap, where God's presence dwells with His creatures.

Eden was sacred space: the primordial temple where God walked with humanity. Knowledge of God in Eden wasn't theoretical; it was experiential. Adam and Eve knew God as an intimate reality because they lived in His presence.

The Tabernacle and Temple: God commanded Israel to construct these structures not to house a distant deity but to localize His presence among them. The glory-cloud filled the Holy of Holies. Priests encountered God in the rituals, in the sacrifices, in the very architecture designed to mediate divine presence. God's existence was not a question—His presence was the organizing reality of their worship and life.

Jesus as the living Temple: When Jesus says, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up" (John 2:19), He's claiming to be the ultimate sacred space—the place where God dwells fully and the means by which humanity encounters God. To be near Jesus is to be in the presence of God.

Believers as temples: Paul declares, "Do you not know that you are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in you?" (1 Corinthians 3:16). Christians are now walking sacred spaces, carriers of God's presence. Knowing God is not primarily cognitive assent to propositions; it's hosting the living God within, being indwelt by His Spirit.

The sacred-space framework reveals that God's existence is never abstract. It's always about presence—whether manifested in a place (Eden, Sinai, the Temple), a person (Jesus), or a people (the Church indwelt by the Spirit).

Knowing God Relationally, Not Just Intellectually

Scripture draws a sharp distinction between knowing about God and knowing God Himself.

Knowing about God can coexist with alienation from God:

  • The Pharisees knew Scripture exhaustively yet failed to recognize God's presence in Jesus (John 5:39-40).
  • Demons possess correct theological information—"You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder!" (James 2:19)—but they are in rebellion, not relationship.
  • In the judgment scene of Matthew 7:21-23, many claim to have prophesied and cast out demons in Jesus' name, yet Jesus declares, "I never knew you." They performed religious acts without genuine relationship.

Knowing God personally transforms:

  • Jesus defines eternal life not as cognitive mastery but as relational intimacy: "This is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent" (John 17:3).
  • Paul counts all his religious credentials as "loss" compared to "the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord" (Philippians 3:8).
  • John writes, "We know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments" (1 John 2:3). Knowledge of God bears relational fruit—obedience, love, transformation.

Biblical knowing is the Hebrew concept of yada—intimate, experiential knowledge. It's the word used for sexual intimacy between husband and wife (Genesis 4:1), for God's covenantal relationship with Israel (Amos 3:2), and for the knowledge of God that believers possess through the Spirit. This is not detached observation; it's participatory communion.

The Role of Reason and Evidence

Does this mean evidence and reason have no place in knowing God? Not at all. Scripture affirms that creation testifies to God's existence (Psalm 19:1; Romans 1:20), that God gives signs and wonders to authenticate His messengers (Exodus 4:1-9; John 20:30-31), and that believers should be ready to give reasons for their hope (1 Peter 3:15).

But evidence and reasoning follow from encounter—they don't precede it. They confirm and clarify what God has already made known through His self-revelation. They help remove intellectual obstacles and show the coherence of faith. But they cannot replace encounter.

Consider the disciples:

  • They didn't follow Jesus because they first constructed philosophical arguments for His divinity. They encountered Him—His teaching, His miracles, His presence—and were drawn to follow. Later, after the resurrection, they reflected theologically on who He was.
  • Thomas doubted the resurrection until Jesus appeared to him personally: "Put your finger here, and see my hands" (John 20:27). The evidence was experiential and relational, not merely propositional.
  • Paul's Damascus Road experience (Acts 9) wasn't the conclusion of a rational argument—it was a blinding encounter with the risen Christ. Afterward, Paul's brilliant theological mind worked to articulate the implications, but the foundation was the encounter.

Evidence and reason serve encounter; they don't substitute for it. Arguments for God's existence (cosmological, teleological, moral, etc.) can clear away intellectual barriers and show faith's rationality. But they can't generate the living knowledge of God that comes through His self-disclosure and our response.

As Pascal famously observed, "The heart has its reasons of which reason knows nothing." Or as he put it elsewhere, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—the God encountered in Scripture—is fundamentally different from "the God of the philosophers."

The Invitation: Come and See

Scripture's approach to the question of God's existence is not "Here's the proof" but "Come and see" (John 1:46).

When Philip tells Nathanael about Jesus, Nathanael is skeptical: "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?" Philip doesn't launch into an argument. He simply says, "Come and see." Nathanael encounters Jesus, who speaks a word of knowledge that reveals He sees Nathanael truly. Nathanael's response is immediate: "Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!" (John 1:49). Encounter convinced him.

Similarly, when the Samaritan woman at the well encounters Jesus (John 4), she doesn't receive a theological lecture. Jesus engages her personally, reveals knowledge He couldn't naturally have, and speaks to her deepest thirst. She returns to her town saying, "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?" (John 4:29). She invites others to encounter what she encountered.

The biblical pattern is invitation to encounter, not coercion through argument. God makes Himself known. We're invited to respond—to seek Him, to draw near, to taste and see that the Lord is good (Psalm 34:8).

Seeking and Finding

Scripture promises that those who genuinely seek God will find Him—not as a proposition proven, but as a presence encountered:

  • "You will seek me and find me, when you seek me with all your heart" (Jeremiah 29:13).
  • "Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you" (James 4:8).
  • "Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you" (Matthew 7:7).

The condition is sincerity. God doesn't hide from those who genuinely want to know Him. But He also doesn't force Himself on those who prefer autonomy. The atheist who demands God prove Himself on the atheist's terms—appearing on command, submitting to empirical testing, conforming to human criteria—is like the creature demanding the Creator justify Himself. It reverses the fundamental relationship.

The humble seeker who says, "God, if You're real, show me"—that's a prayer God answers. Countless testimonies throughout history bear witness to this: God reveals Himself to those who seek Him earnestly.

The Incarnation: God's Ultimate Self-Disclosure

The question "Does God exist?" finds its ultimate answer in Jesus Christ. Not an answer in the form of a proof, but an answer in the form of a person.

In Jesus, God doesn't remain distant and abstract. He enters creation, takes on flesh, and makes His presence tangible. "No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known" (John 1:18). Jesus is the exegesis of God—the one who fully explains, displays, and embodies who God is.

When skeptics demanded signs, Jesus gave them Himself. When Thomas doubted, Jesus invited him to touch His wounds. The incarnation is God's gracious condescension to our need for encounter. He doesn't remain in heaven and demand we climb up through philosophical proofs. He comes down, pitches His tent among us (John 1:14, literally "tabernacled"), and says, "Here I am."

And through the Holy Spirit, Jesus remains present with His people. "I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you" (John 14:18). The risen Christ, through the Spirit, continues to make Himself known to those who trust Him. This is why Christians don't merely believe propositions about God—they claim to know God personally through ongoing communion with Christ by the Spirit.

Living in the Presence

For believers, the question is no longer "Does God exist?" but "How do I live in response to the God whose presence I've encountered?"

This transforms everything:

Prayer becomes not religious duty but conversation with a Person who is actually there and actually listening.

Worship becomes not rote ritual but joyful response to the One whose glory fills our gathering.

Obedience becomes not mere rule-following but trust-filled response to the One who loves us and knows what's best.

Mission becomes not recruiting for an ideology but introducing others to the living God we've encountered.

Suffering is endured not alone but in the presence of the One who promised, "I am with you always" (Matthew 28:20).

The biblical vision is not humans proving God's existence but humans living in sacred space—in communion with the God who is present, who dwells with His people, whose Spirit indwells believers, and who is making all things new.

Conclusion: From Proof to Presence

The question "Does God exist?" is often asked from the wrong posture. It treats God as an object to be analyzed, a hypothesis to be tested, a conclusion to be reached through dispassionate inquiry. But Scripture presents God as the subject who takes initiative, who reveals Himself, who speaks, who acts, who enters His own creation in Jesus Christ.

God is not waiting to be proven. He is already present, making Himself known in creation, in conscience, in Scripture, and ultimately in Christ. The question is not whether He exists, but whether we'll recognize His presence and respond.

For those genuinely seeking, God promises encounter. Not necessarily in dramatic visions or audible voices (though sometimes, yes), but in the whisper of conscience, the testimony of creation, the witness of Scripture, the proclamation of the gospel, the fellowship of believers, and the interior work of the Holy Spirit illuminating truth and drawing hearts to Christ.

Knowing God is relational before it's propositional. It's participatory before it's theoretical. It's presence before proof.

The biblical invitation stands: "Taste and see that the LORD is good!" (Psalm 34:8). Come and encounter. Draw near and be drawn near to. Seek and find. Not God as an abstract concept, but God as living presence—the One in whom "we live and move and have our being" (Acts 17:28).

This is the God who exists—not as a distant object requiring proof, but as the ever-present reality in whom all existence is held, who draws near to those who seek Him, and who supremely made Himself known in Jesus Christ. The question is not whether He exists, but whether we'll open ourselves to the presence that is already there, waiting to be recognized.


Thoughtful Questions to Consider

  1. Have you experienced moments where God felt more like a presence to be encountered than a proposition to be proven? What characterized those moments?

  2. How might the modern emphasis on scientific proof and empirical verification make it harder to recognize God, who reveals Himself primarily through personal encounter and relationship?

  3. Jesus said to Philip, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father." How does the incarnation—God becoming human in Jesus—address our need for God to be more than an abstract concept?

  4. What's the difference between knowing about God (theological information) and knowing God personally? How have you experienced this distinction in your own spiritual journey?

  5. If sacred space is anywhere God's presence dwells—and believers are now temples of the Holy Spirit—how should this change the way you think about encountering God in everyday life?


Further Reading Suggestions

  1. "The Knowledge of the Holy" by A.W. Tozer – A devotional exploration of God's attributes, emphasizing that knowing God is the soul's greatest treasure and that true knowledge of God transforms us.

  2. "Knowing God" by J.I. Packer – A classic that distinguishes between knowing about God and truly knowing Him, emphasizing relationship over mere information.

  3. "The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism" by Timothy Keller (especially Chapters 1-7) – While this book does address intellectual obstacles to faith, Keller consistently emphasizes that the goal is not just intellectual assent but personal encounter with the living God.

  4. Psalm 42, John 14-17, and Philippians 3:7-14 – Read these passages slowly, noticing the language of intimate, experiential knowing rather than abstract belief. Pay attention to how the biblical authors speak of encountering God personally.

  5. "The Sacred Romance: Drawing Closer to the Heart of God" by Brent Curtis and John Eldredge – Explores how God desires relationship with us, not just religious observance, and how Christianity is fundamentally about a love story between God and humanity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about knowing God through union with Christ?

What about knowing God through union with Christ—sharing His life, death, and resurrection rather than simply affirming doctrines about Him? Christianity is not fundamentally about intellectual assent to a set of propositions. While right belief matters, the gospel's ultimate invitation is not to a doctrinal system but to a Person —and not merely to know about that Person, but to know Him intimately by sharing His very life. This is the heart of what theologians call union with Christ : a participatory relationship in which believers are joined to Jesus in His death, resurrection, and ongoing life, becoming recipients of everything He accomplished and everything He is. Beyond Intellectual Agreement It's possible to affirm every orthodox doctrine about Jesus and still not truly know Him. The demons themselves believe correct theology about God's identity—and shudder (James 2:19). Intellectual orthodoxy, while important, can become a substitute for living relationship. T...

What about the Catholic Church?

What about the Catholic Church when the question is not "Is it right or wrong?" but "What has Christ been faithfully preserving here—and what is he still calling to repentance and renewal?" This question is profoundly important and reflects a mature theological posture—one that seeks to discern Christ's ongoing work rather than simply rendering verdict. When we approach the Catholic Church through the lens of sacred space, divine presence, and Christ's cosmic mission, we discover a complex and beautiful reality: a tradition that has faithfully preserved essential truths while also bearing marks of institutional corruption and theological drift that require ongoing reform. What Christ Has Faithfully Preserved in the Catholic Tradition 1. The Continuity of Apostolic Witness The Catholic Church has served as a crucial guardian of the apostolic faith across centuries. From the early councils that articulated Trinitarian and Christological orthodoxy (Nicaea, ...

What about the prosperity gospel?

What about the prosperity gospel—does it proclaim God's generosity or reshape God into a means of personal gain? The prosperity gospel is one of the most seductive distortions of Christianity in the modern world. It promises health, wealth, and success to those who have enough faith, give enough money, or speak the right confessions. It fills stadiums, dominates Christian television, and has spread globally—particularly in the developing world where economic desperation makes its promises especially attractive. But beneath its glossy exterior and feel-good messages lies a profound theological poison: it transforms God from the sovereign Lord who calls us to costly discipleship into a cosmic vending machine dispensing blessings in exchange for our faith-coins. It reshapes the gospel from "die to yourself and follow Christ" into "use God to get what you want." And in doing so, it doesn't proclaim God's generosity—it blasphemes it. What Is the Prosperit...